Riceviamo da Washington DC, dove il marchio Luce Pavese è registrato ed è stato tirato in ballo nella rogatoria internazionale CASSATA:
TO: The Prosecutor’s Office of Pavia / Automattic Inc. Legal Department
FROM: LUCE PAVESE TM
SUBJECT: Filing for “Simulazione di Reato” (False Police Report), Procedural Fraud, and Attempted Violation of the First Amendment.
1. STATEMENT OF FACTS
The undersigned formally reports a grave instance of procedural fraud and the filing of a false police report by the complainant.
• Non-Existent Source: The complainant filed a criminal report based on content allegedly published on a website source that has been offline and inactive for a significant period.
• Contradiction of Evidence: The complainant provided the Prosecutor’s Office with digital materials (videos/images) claiming they were currently hosted on platform. However, the official response from Automattic Inc. (San Francisco, CA) dated March 19, 2026, explicitly states that the request for legal assistance was denied as it did not comply with legal requirements.
2. ATTEMPTED VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
The complainant deliberately misrepresented the nature of the published material to circumvent the protections of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
• By falsely categorizing legitimate journalistic inquiries as criminal conduct, the complainant attempted to induce a U.S.-based entity (Automattic Inc.) to perform an illegal act of censorship.
• The denial from the U.S. authorities confirms that the complainant’s claims were found to be without merit and in direct conflict with the fundamental rights of free speech and press freedom.
3. EVIDENCE OF FABRICATION (SIMULAZIONE DI REATO)
It is evident that the complainant has engaged in the fabrication of evidence.
• Discrepancy: There is a total lack of correspondence between the digital “footprint” of the files provided by the complainant and the actual data stored on the US servers.
• Intent: The complainant’s sole intent was to induce the Italian Prosecutor’s Office into an error of fact, triggering an international letters rogatory (rogatoria internazionale) under false pretenses.
4. PROCEDURAL FRAUD AND MISUSE OF PUBLIC RESOURCES
The complainant’s actions have led to a significant waste of public judicial resources. The use of international judicial cooperation for a claim based on fabricated evidence constitutes Procedural Fraud.
5. FORMAL REQUEST
The undersigned hereby requests that the Prosecutor’s Office:
1. Perform a Hash-MD5 verification on the files provided by the complainant.
2. Open a formal investigation against the complainant for Simulazione di Reato (Art. 367 Italian Penal Code) and Fraud against the State.
3. Cross-reference the complainant’s deposition with the official “No Violation” status confirmed by the US hosting provider.
Respectfully submitted,
LUCE PAVESE TM
Luce-pavese.com 
Leave a comment